thbs2 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Thbs2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 28 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thbs2/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 28 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Targeting fibroblast derived thrombospondin 2 disrupts an immune-exclusionary environment at the tumor front in colorectal cancer"
Article Title: Targeting fibroblast derived thrombospondin 2 disrupts an immune-exclusionary environment at the tumor front in colorectal cancer
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66485-2
Figure Legend Snippet: a, b THBS2 expression in each subtype of CMS ( a , n: CMS1 = 85, CMS2 = 132, CMS3 = 78, CMS4 = 184) and IMF ( b n: MSI = 82, iCMS2_MSS_NF = 117, iCMS3_MSS_NF = 73, iCMS2_MSS_F = 101, iCMS3_MSS_F = 51) in TCGA-COADREAD dataset. c THBS2 expression in iCMS2 or iCMS3 in TCGA (n: iCMS2 = 298, iCMS3 = 232). d Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival of iCMS2 or iCMS3 patients according to THBS2 expression in TCGA dataset (n: iCMS2, THBS2 high = 139, THBS2 low = 143; iCMS3, THBS2 high = 118, THBS2 low = 106). e–m scRNA-seq analyses of Colorectal Atlas dataset (n = 192). Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of all cells colored by tissue origin ( e ) and cell types ( f ). UMAP feature plot colored by THBS2 expression ( g ). Violin plots for indicated gene expression in fibroblast subsets ( h ). UMAP plot of tumor fibroblast subsets colored by cell types ( i ). Dot plots of indicated gene expression across CAF subtypes ( j ). Violin plots for indicated gene expression ( k ) and gene signatures ( l ) in tumor fibroblast subsets. Scatter plots showing the proportions of THBS2-positive CAFs and mCAF-positive CAFs in individual patients ( m ). n Co-immunostaining for THBS2 (RNAscope) and CD8 in CMS-annotated human CRC. T: tumor, NT: non-tumor, F: tumor front, I: tumor interior. White lines denote tumor borders. o–t Xenium 5K panel analyses of tumor–non-tumor interfaces in CMS1/MSI and CMS4/MSS CRCs. T tumor, NT non-tumor, F tumor front. Spatial maps ( o,q,r ) and corresponding pie charts ( p ) showing annotated cell types. Black dashed lines denote tumor borders. Three-dimensional density maps ( s ) and quantification of CD8⁺ T-cell density (n = 6, respectively; technical replicates) ( t ). Dunnett’s test, two-sided ( a, b ), unpaired Student’s t-test, two-sided ( c ), Log-rank test ( d ), Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-sided ( k, l ), Pearson correlation coefficient, two-sided ( m ), and Mann-Whitney test, two-sided ( t ). Mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 200 μm ( n, o, q, r ). Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made in ( a, b ), and not in ( k, l ). Box and whiskers graphs indicate the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles, with minimum and maximum values at the extremes of the whiskers. Source data are provided as a file.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression, Immunostaining, RNAscope, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic representation of orthotopic implantation of MTO to WT mice. b Immunofluorescence (left) for CD8 and THBS2 in orthotopic MTO tumors, and quantification of CD8 + cells (right, n = 3; biological replicates). Scale bars, 500 μm (top), 100 μm (bottom). White lines denote tumor borders. c Schematic representation of orthotopic implantation of MTO to WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. d Macroscopic images (top) and H&E staining (bottom) of orthotopic implantation in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. Scale bars, 1 mm. e, f Volume ( e , n: WT = 15, Thbs2 -/- = 16) and the change in diameter ( f , n: WT = 12, Thbs2 -/- = 15) of orthotopic tumors in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. g, h Incidence ( g , left), macroscopic numbers ( g , right), and H&E staining ( h ) of liver metastasis (met, arrows) in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n: WT = 15, Thbs2 -/- = 16). Scale bars, 1 mm. i Kaplan-Meier curves after MTO implantation (n: WT = 17, Thbs2 -/- = 19). j , Immunofluorescence for CD8, THBS2, and αSMA in orthotopic tumors in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice 5-weeks post-injection of MTOs. Scale bars, 500 μm. k , Volcano plot of upregulated genes in Thbs2 -/- mice versus WT mice after MTO implantation (n = 3 biological replicates). l–n Anti-CD8 antibody (αCD8 ab) treatment on MTO-bearing WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n: WT control = 6, WT αCD8 ab = 6, Thbs2 -/- control = 7, Thbs2 -/- αCD8 ab = 8). Schematic representation ( l ), macroscopic images ( m ), and volumes and weights ( n ) of tumors. o , p Immunohistochemistry for indicated proteins ( o ) and quantification ( p ) in orthotopic tumors of WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n = 3). Red dashed lines denote tumors ( d, m ). Scale bars, 50 μm. Tukey’s test, two-sided ( b ), Unpaired Student’s t-test, two-sided ( e, g ), two-way ANOVA ( f ), Log-rank test ( i ), Fisher’s exact test, two-sided ( g ), Fisher’s LSD test, two-sided ( n, p ). Mean ± SEM. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made in ( b ). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Injection, Control, Immunohistochemistry
Figure Legend Snippet: a Gene targeting strategy for Thbs2 . b Schematic representation of orthotopic implantation of MTO to Thbs2 f/f or fibroblast-specific Thbs2 knockout mice ( Thbs2 ΔFibro). c Thbs2 expression in MTO-derived orthotopic tumors from Thbs2 f/f or Thbs2 ΔFibro mice analyzed by qRT-PCR (n = 3). d Macroscopic images of orthotopic tumors in Thbs2 f/f or Thbs2 ΔFibro mice. e Tumor diameter in Thbs2 f/f or Thbs2 ΔFibro mice (n = 11). f Immunofluorescence for CD8 and THBS2 in orthotopic MTO tumors. F: tumor front, I: tumor interior. Magnified views (middle and right) correspond to the yellow and magenta boxed regions in the left panels. g Immunohistochemistry for cleaved-caspase 3 (C-Cas3) in orthotopic MTO tumors. h Quantification of CD8 + cells in ( f ) and C-Cas3 + cells in ( g ; n = 3; biological replicates). i , Schematic representation of orthotopic co-implantation of MTO and WT CAF or Thbs2 -/- CAF into WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. Comparisons were made between tumors in WT mice implanted with WT CAF, tumors in Thbs2 -/- mice implanted with Thbs2 -/- CAF, and tumors in Thbs2 -/- mice implanted with WT CAF. j, k Macroscopic images ( j ) and volumes ( k ) of orthotopic tumors in ( i )(n: MTO & WT CAF → WT = 12, MTO & Thbs2 -/- CAF → Thbs2 -/- = 10, MTO & WT CAF→ Thbs2 -/- = 10). l–o Immunofluorescence ( l ) and immunohistochemistry ( m ) for indicated proteins in orthotopic tumors from ( i ), with quantifications ( n, o ) (n = 3; biological replicates). F: tumor front, I: tumor interior. Magnified views (middle and bottom) correspond to the yellow and magenta boxed regions in the top panels ( l ). Scale bars: 1 mm ( d, j ), 200 μm ( f, l ), 50 μm ( g, m ). Unpaired Student’s t-test, two-sided ( c, e, h ), Šídák’s multiple comparison test, two-sided ( k ), Tukey’s test, two-sided ( n, o ). Mean ± SEM. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made in ( n, o, k ). Source data are provided as a file.
Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunofluorescence, Immunohistochemistry, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: a, b UMAP of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of orthotopic MTO tumors in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. all tumor cells colored by host mouse genotypes ( a ) and major cellular components ( b ). c Pie charts showing the proportions of indicated cell types in each genotype. d, e UMAP of immune cells colored by cell types ( d ) and proportion of each cell type ( e ). f UMAP of T and natural killer cells (T/NK cells) colored by cell types. g Proportion of T/NK cell types. h, i UMAP of CD8 + T cells colored by cell subtypes ( h ) and cell counts of each subtype ( i ). j, k Violin plots of CD8 + T cells ( j ) and monocytes/macrophages (Mono/Macs) ( k ) for indicated gene signatures. l Immunofluorescence staining of indicated proteins in orthotopic tumors. Scale bars, 100 μm. m Violin plots of Mono/Mac for indicated gene signatures. n UMAP of Mono/Mac colored by cell subtypes. o–q Proportion ( o ) and violin plots for indicated gene signatures and gene expression ( p, q ) of Mono/Mac subtypes. r–t UMAP of DCs colored by DC subtypes ( r ). UMAP feature plots of DCs in WT and Thbs2 -/- mice for indicated gene expression ( s ). t Violin plots of cDCs for indicated genes signatures. u, v UMAP of all tumor cells ( u ) and immune cells ( v ) colored by cell types (left) and feature plots for Cxcl10 (right). w UMAP of T/NK cells colored by cell types (left) and feature plots for Cxcr3 (right). x Schematic representation of models for CD8 + T cell recruitment regulated by THBS2 + CAF. Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-sided ( j,k,m,p,q,t ). Source data are provided as a file.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: a Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) images of orthotopic tumors in WT or Thbs2 -/- mice at two weeks post-injection of MTO. White lines denote tumor borders. Scale bars, 100 μm. T: tumor, NT: non-tumor. b–d Neighborhood composition analyses using CytoMAP. Region prevalence ( b ) and dimensionality reduction UMAP plots ( c, d ) of neighborhoods involving CD8 + T cells, F4/80 + TAMs, and CD11c + DCs in tumors of WT or Thbs2 -/- mice. Regions are color-coded based on types defined in Supplementary Fig. . e–g CD8 + T cell infiltration analysis. Representative images showing infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells; inset images highlight infiltration bands at the tumor–non-tumor interface ( e ). Green lines indicate tumor borders. Histograms ( f ) and scatter plots ( g ) show distances of CD8 + T cells from borders (n: WT = 261, Thbs2 -/- = 2459). h–m Proximity analyses between CD8 + T cells, F4/80 + macrophages, and CD11c + DCs. Green lines indicate tumor borders. Representative images ( h ) histograms ( i ) and scatter plots ( j ) show the nearest distances between CD8 + T cells and CD11c + DCs (n: WT = 706, Thbs2 -/- = 880). Representative images ( k ) histograms ( l ) and scatter plots ( m ) show the nearest distances between CD8 + T cells and F4/80 + macrophages (n: WT = 960, Thbs2 -/- = 1022). Green lines denote tumor borders. Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided ( g, j, m ). Mean ± SEM. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Imaging, Mass Cytometry, Injection, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: a–e Combined blockage of CXCL9 (αCXCL9 ab) and CXCL10 (αCXCL10 ab) in MTO-bearing WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n: WT control = 8, WT αCXCL9 ab/CXCL10 ab = 9, Thbs2 -/- control = 6, Thbs2 -/- αCXCL9 ab/CXCL10 ab = 9). Schematic representation ( a ), macroscopic images ( b ), and volumes and weights ( c ) of tumors. Immunofluorescence for CD8 ( d ) and its quantification ( e ). Bottom images show magnified views of the yellow dashed boxes in the top panels ( d ). f–o Anti-CXCR3 antibody (αCXCR3 ab) treatment in MTO-bearing WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n: WT control = 10, WT αCXCR3 ab = 10, Thbs2 -/- control = 7, Thbs2 -/- αCXCR3 ab = 8). Schematic representation ( f ) macroscopic images ( g ) and volumes and weights ( h ) of tumors. i Representative IMC images of orthotopic tumors. T: tumor, NT: non-tumor. j, k CD8 + T cell infiltration analysis from ( f ). Histograms ( j ) and scatter plots ( k ) show distances of CD8 + T cells from tumor borders. l–o , Proximity analyses between CD8 + T cells and F4/80 + macrophages or CD11c + DCs in ( f ). Histograms ( l ) and scatter plots ( m ) show the nearest distances between CD8 + T cells and CD11c + DCs. Histograms ( n ) and scatter plots ( o ) show the nearest distances between CD8 + T cells and F4/80 + macrophages. Red dashed lines indicate tumor regions in ( b,g ). White lines denote tumor borders in ( i ). Scale bars, 1 mm ( b, g ), 500 μm ( d , top), 50 μm ( d , bottom), 100 μm ( i ). Fisher’s LSD test ( c,e,h ), Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided ( k,m,o ). Mean ± SEM. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Control, Immunofluorescence, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: a–f Immunofluorescence for CD8 and PD-1 in MTO-derived orthotopic tumors from WT or Thbs2 -/- mice at 2-weeks ( a ), 5-weeks ( c ), and 9-weeks ( e ) post-injection of MTO. White lines denote the tumor borders. Scale bars, 100 μm. Quantification of PD-1 + and PD-1 - CD8 + T cells at 2-weeks ( b ), 5-weeks ( d ), and 9-weeks ( f ) post-injection of MTO. F tumor front, I tumor interior. Magnified views (right panels for WT and Thbs2 -/- ) correspond to the yellow and magenta boxed regions in the left panels. g Violin plots of T cells for indicated gene signatures in tumors from WT and THBS2 -/- mice. h, i Box plots of GSVA values for indicated gene signatures in each CMS (n: CMS1 = 85, CMS2 = 132, CMS3 = 78, CMS4 = 184) subtype of CRC in TCGA-COADREAD dataset. j GSEA for Thbs2 KO signatures comparing CMS1 CRCs vs. CMS4 CRCs in TCGA. k–n Anti-PD-1 antibody (αPD-1 ab) or anti-CTLA-4 antibody (αCTLA-4 ab) treatment in MTO-bearing WT or Thbs2 -/- mice (n: WT control = 12, WT αCTLA-4 ab = 11, WT αPD-1 ab = 12, Thbs2 -/- control = 11, Thbs2 -/- αCTLA-4 ab = 11, Thbs2 -/- αPD-1 ab = 13). Schematic representation ( k ) changes in tumor diameter ( l ) tumor weights and volumes ( m ) and H&E images of tumors ( n ). Scale bars, 1 mm ( n ). Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-sided ( g ) Dunnett’s test, two-sided ( h, i ) Two-way ANOVA ( l ) Unpaired t-test, two-sided ( m ). Mean ± SEM. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made in ( h, i ) and not in ( m ). Box and whiskers graphs indicate the median and the 25 and 75th percentiles, with minimum and maximum values at the extremes of the whiskers. Source data are provided as a file.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Derivative Assay, Injection, Control

